By:
jimmychurch on 1/27/11
I think what the article fails to mention is that Obama's speech are just more false promises. He has not done anything to help anybody, but himself. Once he saw he would not be re-elected, the speeches changed. How can someone be so gullible. Oh, guess I forgot who wrote the article for a moment.
By:
Sprtman on 1/27/11
Now can we start the election for a new President?
By:
SocEtTuem on 1/31/11
The SOTU, despite almost nauseating and utterly undeserved praise by a large chunk of the national media, was certainly nothing spectacular nor did it reveal any new strategies for putting more Americans back into permanent, private sector jobs.
Vile is correct in stating Americas unique freedoms are what has made us great, freedoms that too many seem all to willing to surrender to mother government for another shot at the government nipple. He is also correct that the SOTU and responses were long on rhetoric - and the need for a serious reduction in the national debt. Unfortunately, Obama proposed more spending (less than cleverly disguised as "investment"). Congressman Ryan had the right idea, reductions in spending, but was short on ideas.
No one seems to have the courage to step up to the plate and say public pensions, medicare and other grossly "obese" entitlement programs must be trimmed. Until the gravy train leaves the station permanently, we will all suffer.
We are in urgent need of a leader who will in fact LEAD. That means being honest with us that unpleasant sacrifices are ahead because our government has failed to fiscally control itself.
By:
Sprtman on 2/1/11
Vote early, vote often, vote Republican.
By:
cmac on 2/2/11
Dean Vile's comments on the Obama pitch are, for the most part, acceptable. The American voter forced Obama to move toward center left of political reality. I doubt he enjoyed the temporary ploy.
I must take issue with the dean's view of science, engineering, and technology, however. Obama's pitch did not "leave behind" the social sciences and humanities. Obama is a socialist of the first order. He will never leave behind his socialist agenda.
Society ("social" science)has never in American history led science, engineering and technology into research and development. Quite the opposite. Society (social Science) follows Science, Engineering and Technology into the future.
For example, society did not iniatiate discoveries such as cell theory, gene theory, mutation theory, germ theory of disease, natural selection theory, electric light bulbs, human flight, atomic energy, television, telephone, computer engineering, space travel, etc.
Society follows wherever science may lead.
We now wait to see if Obama follows through with his political pitch to fund science "education".
If he wants society (social sciences) to advance, he will fund real science education.
The path from the past leads to the future.