• Sidebar Ads




Trooper testifies driving speed would prevent fatal crash


 Related Articles
Email Print
Trooper testifies driving speed would prevent fatal crash | Ron Killings trial, Lakeisha White

Former Rutherford County Detective Sgt. Ron Killings listens to testimony during trial for a reckless homicide charge related to the death of Lakeisha White, 11. TMP/M. Willard
If a sheriff’s detective had driven the speed limit, an 11-year-old girl would have avoided a crash with his patrol car, a Tennessee Highway Patrol trooper testified Wednesday.

Pedestrian Lakeisha White, 11, of Hopkinsville, Ky., died July 19, 2008 after she was struck by a patrol cruiser driven by former sheriff’s Detective Sgt. Ron Killings July 18, 2008 on Bradyville Pike. Lakeisha was visiting relatives during the summer when the crash occurred.

Trooper Allan Brenneis testified for the state in Killings’ trial for reckless homicide. Circuit Court Judge David Bragg is presiding over the trial with jurors selected from Hamilton County because of pretrial publicity.

Killings pleaded not guilty to the charge Tuesday when the trial began.

The state rested its case Wednesday afternoon. The defense is expected to call witnesses when the trial resumes at 9 a.m. Thursday.

Brenneis, who investigates traffic fatalities for the THP’s Critical Incident Response Team, testified his investigation showed Killings drove 70 mph in a 30 mph speed zone within 20 seconds of the crash. He drove 62 mph when his air bag deployed.

The trooper calculated an 11-year-old’s speed crossing Bradyville Pike with a car approaching at 30 mph.

“At 30 mph, everything changes,” Brenneis said, later adding, “At 30 mph, it doesn’t happen.”

Killings listened without any reaction.

Sgt. Michael McAlister testified he downloaded the airbag module crash data removal system from Killings’ car last October. The information is locked after a crash. He gave the information to Brenneis.

Brenneis said he retracted the steps with her cousins who were with her when the crash occurred and reviewed Lakeisha’s injuries with state medical examiner Dr. Bruce Levy who performed the autopsy on her.

He compared the contact points on Killings’ car, concluding she was struck on the right hand side on her hips, then spun around and traveled up on the windshield.

Prosecutor Joe Baugh asked if he could calculate the speed when Lakeisha was struck.

“No sir,” Brenneis replied.

Since witnesses reported Lakeisha was running, Brenneis took the running speed of an 11-year-old and compared the speed of Killings, determining he was 183 back at 65 mph and could have seen her.

“He doesn’t hit the brakes,” Brenneis said, explaining she came from the driver’s side. In his statement, Killings said the first time he saw Lakeisha was when she hit the windshield.

Defense attorney Terry Fann asked Brenneis if Lakeisha ran into Killings lane?

“Yes,” Brenneis replied.

Did Killings lose control of his vehicle, Fann asked.

“I saw nothing to indicate he lost control of his vehicle,” Brenneis answered, adding he came to a controlled stop.

Brenneis listed speed and Lakeisha running into Killings’ path as the contributing factors to the crash.

In earlier testimony, former La Vergne Police Detective Cpl. Jerri Lynn Champion testified she was talking on the telephone with Killings at 8:37 p.m. Earlier witnesses said the crash happened about 8:45 p.m.

Champion said she couldn’t remember what they were talking about but she heard Killings say, “oh f---“ and the call ended.

Baugh asked Brenneis if Killings talking on the cell phone affected his response time.

“It’s what we call divided attention,” Brenneis said. “I would consider that a contributing factor.”

Fann asked if the trooper included the cell phone as a factor in his crash report.

“I should have added that,” Brenneis said.

In the morning’s testimony, witness Rayneshia Coleman, 10, testified she saw her cousin Lakeisha “up in the air” after she was struck by the patrol car.

Another cousin, Rayvon Watkins, 10, didn’t see the crash either.

“I heard like a boom sound,” Rayvon said.

Baugh asked witness Cheryl Bigsby to tell jurors about what she saw the night of the crash.

Bigsby testified she was on her porch about dusk. Like the children, she didn’t see the crash but heard the impact.

“It was like he smashed on his brakes and a clinking noise,” Bigsby said.

Bigsby ran over to Lakeisha and the other children and found Lakeisha lying near the mailbox with her legs around the mailbox.

“Once she got hit, it was like floating up in the air,” Bigsby said. “It was like a rainbow.”

Killings was talking on the phone when he got out of his car and asked, “Is she OK?”

He didn’t ask her name, walked over to her and then pulled coveralls from the trunk and threw it over her. He did not begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

“When I looked down at her, it was like her eyes were dangling around,” Bigsby said.

Normally, Lakeisha wore glasses but didn’t wear the glasses that night.

Defense attorney Terry Fann asked Bigsby if she remembered telling a private investigator Killings didn’t throw on his brakes.

“No,” Bigsby replied.

Bigsby said she told Murfreesboro Police Officer Ray Daniel Killings stayed with Lakeisha till the ambulance arrived.

She never saw the patrol car swerve. She told Daniel she saw Killings stop immediately.

Baugh asked about Killings’ response to Lakeisha at first.

It appeared Killings was trying to leave the scene because he pulled up, then backed up, she said.

Since Dr. Levy could not testify Wednesday, jurors read copies of the autopsy report and the state rested its case.

Defense attorney Ben Parsley asked Bragg to acquit Killings because the state failed to prove its case.

Baugh said he provided sufficient evidence.

Bragg denied the motion, which will allow the jury to deliberate and give a verdict.



 
 
 
Tagged under  Lakeisha White, Ron Killings trial


Member Opinions:
By: ebbabc on 2/10/10
I seem to recall the first report after it happened said he was going home, and not speeding.
Now we hear he was responding to another officer's call for assistance.
How many police officers respond to calls with open liquor in their vehicle I wonder?
If I am incorrect be sure to correct me!

By: Paused on 2/10/10
My understanding is that his BAC was 0%, that the bottles were in his trunk, and that the alcohol bottles are not being used as evidence.

By: Trvlace on 2/10/10
I'd say if you or I hit this child, we'd be in jail since we were speeding, and had open containers in the car. The liquor in the squad car really bothers me....bad bad bad. Wonder if he had some blow too? Or what ever they call it now days...but it wouldn't surprise me if he did. And he got out of the car and did not hang up his phone...what was he on? Did they test his blood?

By: spook on 2/10/10
How about he was on the SO issued Nextel calling into dispatch about the crash? And is it illegal to have TRASH in the TRUNK of a patrol car?? No open containers in the passenger area of the car and 0% BAC. Give it a rest people, it was a tragic accident!

By: josef on 2/10/10
Isn't it amazing how the ossifers circle to "protect" their own?
then when they are caught, they run like the "heroes" they are NOT!
Killings and his ilk are lying to cover a FALSE hero

By: Newport1 on 2/10/10
So he was on his SO issued Nextel calling into dispatch, huh? No, turns out he was on the phone with a Lavergne female detective he met at a seminar. Hmmmm, let's see what his groupies have to say now.

By: hocuspoc1 on 2/10/10
Spook.. I don't really know what happened, but I don't think the SO makes you use your personal cell phone for county bussiness.. So was he speeding to get to Lavergne to help the woman? That is a long way to go.. I'm still trying to figure out there were no lights or sirens if he was headed to an emergency... So where does the other officer form Lavergne come into it? Is there a law against driving and talking on your cell phone? I'm fairly sure you can't text, but I'm not sure about talking on your personal cell phone.

By: pirate1964 on 2/10/10
If a officer has alcohol bottles, empty or not, anywhere in his patrol car, he is NOT an officer that can be respected or trusted. I've known people to get a DUI and non of them waited several hours to get tested and they sure as heck did not stop by a convenience store to get something to drink. It was an accident but it sure STINKS of a cover up.

By: drnitemare on 2/10/10
Most detectives use their own cars and have lighs and sirens installed on them so I would think he was in his own vehicle. This is a tragic thing to happen and I am sure he lives with it every single day. The man saved lives and fought crime. I can imagine how this haunts him.

By: Admiral on 2/10/10
I have 2 comments.
1)It was a tragic accident.
2)We live in a litigious society.

By: WingNut on 2/10/10
I don't know what to believe being that the media tend to twist facts to make a story more interesting. Is he guilty of reckless homicide? Without a doubt. It doesn't matter if he was en route to an official emergency or not, which by the way, I don't think he was, he should not be driving in excess of 70 mph in a 35 mph zone. Plain and simple.

By: attagirl on 2/11/10
You really believe he is "without a doubt" guilty of reckless homicide? No, he is NOT. If he was a private citizen on his way home to dinner, then yes, I would agree. But he was a police officer, having received a second call to "step it up" to a scene, and he was doing exactly what we trained and paid him to do.

The kid should have been supervised and not allowed to run out in the street. She was running ahead of her friends trying to beat them home and simply wasn't paying attention.

By: Boo on 2/11/10
I agree!

By: WingNut on 2/11/10
Endangering himself and other citizens as a police officer or not is reckless. PERIOD!

By: krb on 2/11/10
I'm a police officer. We are constantly multi tasking ALL of the time. And it seems as if Killings was doing so with due care. Where I work, TONS of children run out in traffic, unsupervised, and careless. Its called pedestrian error. The parents are out for blood. They want money and the reputation of the officer and his familty ruined. Its a tragic event, that the officer will NEVER forget. We are traumatized by all the negativity and death we see every day. We dream about it. I feel for the family, and so does Killings who I know he can never express to the family. But he does care. But for the family to call Killings a liar..sorry!! the family will disturb the balance of justice to get what they want. They were not there. Killings was there. What worries me the most.... what if Killings was a white man...God help us!!!

By: applelover on 2/11/10
KRB, most people wouldn't and couldn't do your job. Thank you for the service you and others give to this community.

By: tnbumble on 2/11/10
Im sure theres police officers on this site supporting Killings with false facts and heres a few. Killings admitted on the stand he was talking on his personal cell phone to his girlfriend when accident happened. He took liquor bottles out of his car and hid them in the grass,the liquor store confirms he bought them earlier the same day. Hes on video in a store buying gatorade drinks with fellow police officers before he is given a blood test. Whats sad about all of this is the jury will hear none of it. Whether he was drunk or not is not the problem,the problem is hiding this from the jury.. The jury is going to find him innocent and when reporters ask them would it change their mind if they knew about this hidden evidence they will be shocked. Sad all around.. Another thing if the police officers were just doing their job how come some have been suspended for their actions,something else the jury will not hear. SO when police officers get on here saying they dont protect their own,theyre just showing their stupidity

By: vdanr on 2/11/10
You people are too much!!! It's a good thing none of you are on the jury. Most of what has been posted on this blog are things that were read in the media. Haven't you learned by now that the media only tells you certain things to keep you coming back for more!!! Was the officer speeding? Yes... Should the little girl have been home and under adult supervision? Yes...

A tragic accident!!!

By: tnbumble on 2/11/10
One other thing that puzzles me that maybe some of his homies can explain.. He admitted on the stand that he resigned from the police force because he respects Truman Jones.. If you were doing your job and you respect your boss,why resign??

By: Trvlace on 2/11/10
Trash is his trunk, LOL. What a croc of crud. It was trash only because he chug-a-lugged the liquor and emptied the bottles. Then his cronies came along and covered it up. This type behavior gives the police a bad name. I think the fact he resigned speaks volumes. He knows he messed up. Now time to pay up... Like I said before, had he been a normal tax paying citizen, he'd be in jail already. Lock him up like you would the rest of us already.

By: gotitans2007 on 2/11/10
All I can say is I hope and pray, no child EVER darts out in front of me...whether I am going 30 or 65 mph, it's not going to be a good outcome. With that said, if this were to ever happen to me, putting me in jail for a tragic accident would be double punishment. I would be in my own personal hell for the rest of my life.

By: pirate1964 on 2/11/10
To the ones of you that are police officers or are very pro police not matter what they do... A Lavergne officer was recently hit by a drunkdriver... how many of you will go to the defense of the man that hit the officer? I work with him and he is a good man that screwed up. He is going to have to face the consequences of his poor judgement. This entire event has turned into "us againts them". It was even attempted to make it a race issue of all things. All I think the people want is an unbiased fair trial and the appropriate consequence for any crime. Even cops mess up sometimes and have to be punished. Just because cops enforce the law does NOT make them above the law.

By: tnbumble on 2/11/10
Im still wanting to know if Mr. Killings was just doing his job why resign from the job that puts food on you and your families table because you respect your boss? Would liquor bottles be the answer?

By: pirate1964 on 2/11/10
I agree with "tnbumble"... if SOOOOOOO innocent, then why quit his job??

By: Ponycar on 2/13/10
tnbumble, and pirate, my guess is that you 2 have probably had run ins with the law yourselves. Thats why you dislike police so much. Your argument about the liquor bottles is getting stale. Ron Killings was not drunk. The blood alcohol test proves it. That makes the liquor bottles irrelevent to the case of reckless homocide.


Login and voice your opinion!
Powered by Bondware
Newspaper Software | Email Marketing Tools | E-Commerce Marketplace