-
Sidebar Ads
-
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Email
Print
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Google
Yahoo!Member Opinions:
By: confused on 11/12/10
More State cuts?! great..you already can't get a person on the phone for help in any department that one tries..so cut more. That will be more out of work and more with no $ to spend, so more money lost cause no one will be able to purchase things..why not ask ole Obama for a handout!!??
More State cuts?! great..you already can't get a person on the phone for help in any department that one tries..so cut more. That will be more out of work and more with no $ to spend, so more money lost cause no one will be able to purchase things..why not ask ole Obama for a handout!!??
By: DMW on 11/15/10
No one wants to make cuts in mental health and children's programs but it's time to live within our means.
No one wants to make cuts in mental health and children's programs but it's time to live within our means.
By: SocEtTuem on 11/15/10
You can have it one of two ways, either more and higher taxes (which nobody wants) or spending cuts which everybody wants so long as those cuts do not affect them or their pet programs.
We have been living beyond our means for far too long. Moreover, whether it is poltically correct or not I agree with Thomas Jefferson who said back in his day "I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious." He should see it now!
You can have it one of two ways, either more and higher taxes (which nobody wants) or spending cuts which everybody wants so long as those cuts do not affect them or their pet programs.
We have been living beyond our means for far too long. Moreover, whether it is poltically correct or not I agree with Thomas Jefferson who said back in his day "I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious." He should see it now!
By: publius on 11/16/10
Did you ever notice that conservatives always want to cut funding on the weak and in need The new budget committee suggests cuts in education, veterans health care, Medicare, Medicaid. raising the retirement age,
how about we eliminate the tax breaks for the oil industry or maybe Ross Perots flat tax rate for everybody. he figure 15% would pay off all of our debt. That would be fair don't you think.I would pay the same percentage as the wealthy. My Brother in law (rich) thinks that would be terrible, He paid 9% last year I paid 23%, my point is There are other ways than to attack the weak among us. Maybe we should stop being the worlds police force. they do not seem to appreciate the sacrifice of our treasure. How about we fine people who hire illegals, or maybe tax corporations that ship jobs overseas. My thought is that there are other ways for Christians to behave.
Did you ever notice that conservatives always want to cut funding on the weak and in need The new budget committee suggests cuts in education, veterans health care, Medicare, Medicaid. raising the retirement age,
how about we eliminate the tax breaks for the oil industry or maybe Ross Perots flat tax rate for everybody. he figure 15% would pay off all of our debt. That would be fair don't you think.I would pay the same percentage as the wealthy. My Brother in law (rich) thinks that would be terrible, He paid 9% last year I paid 23%, my point is There are other ways than to attack the weak among us. Maybe we should stop being the worlds police force. they do not seem to appreciate the sacrifice of our treasure. How about we fine people who hire illegals, or maybe tax corporations that ship jobs overseas. My thought is that there are other ways for Christians to behave.
By: DMW on 11/17/10
publius - “conservatives always want to cut funding on the weak and in need”
Where do liberals suggest we get the money to continue spending at the current rate? Cuts have to be made somewhere. There are many conservatives that would be happy with a flat tax. Is it possible your brother in law gave more to charity to help the “weak and in need” and by so reducing his tax burden?
publius - “conservatives always want to cut funding on the weak and in need”
Where do liberals suggest we get the money to continue spending at the current rate? Cuts have to be made somewhere. There are many conservatives that would be happy with a flat tax. Is it possible your brother in law gave more to charity to help the “weak and in need” and by so reducing his tax burden?
Login and voice your opinion!