• Sidebar Ads




RCS to review policy changes


 Related Articles
Email Print
Revising policy will be the topic Thursday night at the Rutherford County Board of Education meeting.

The board will review policy changes stemming from changes to state law and policy, as well as just clarifying existing board policy.

To be implemented, new policies must be approved on two readings.

The following policies will be considered:

• Policy 3.206 – Community Use of School Facilities
Committee will consider whether to allow certain types of for-profit businesses (such as children dance studios) to use school buildings. As of now, only non-profits can use schools.

• Policy 4.600 – Grading System
Two items need to be cleaned up in relation to the new state academic standards. They both deal with how semester averages are used.

• Policy 6.409 – Child Abuse/Neglect
Policy needs to be adjusted because of a new state law about reporting requirements for child abuse/neglect that happens at school.

A new state law says schools have to report it to parents (when it involves their children). The previous law did not make this mandatory, even though RCS does report alleged abuse to parents.

Policy 1.808 – Registered Sex Offenders
This is a change based on a new Attorney General’s opinion about when registered sex offenders are permitted at school.

Previously, registered sex offenders could only come on campus to drop off or pick up their children. The new opinion saws that can come on campus for parent activities when there are school officials present, such as parent-teacher conferences, performances, etc.

Policy 5.109 – Evaluation
This is a cleanup item from the policy manual that was adopted last year. A deadline date for teacher evaluations was not included in the Tennessee Schools Boards Association policy.

• Adoption of new policy regarding employee participation in recreational and/or
fitness activities
This policy is to clarify that unless instructed to do so, employees should not participate in recreational/fitness activities during work hours and that worker’s comp will not cover them if they do and are injured. For example, during field day competitions at schools, teachers don’t need to be doing the sack race.

• Policy 6.204 – Attendance of Non-Resident Students
When the board first adopted a policy about no longer accepting students from out-of-county, a list of students from out-of-county who were already attending was generated. That list is no longer applicable because those students have long since graduated but a reference to it is still in the policy. That reference will be removed.

• Policy 6.314 – Corporal Punishment
This one may be deferred to a future policy meeting. Most school districts in the state have adopted the TSBA policy on corporal punishment.

Part of the language says that principals may take into account things such as gender, size, and emotional wellbeing, and so on when deciding how much corporal punishment to give.

Some rights group has filed a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights against any district who uses the TSBA policy because on the surface it could be construed as being discriminatory.

TSBA has contacted OCR to work a way to fix the language so that it is not discriminatory and once that is done, TSBA will send out the new language for school districts to adopt. TSBA has suggested deleting that entire portion of the policy, but OCR has not responded yet.

The board may defer action on this policy until it hears back from OCR.
 
 
 
Tagged under  RCS


Member Opinions:
By: KidsRpeople2 on 10/28/09
In a recent news article it was reported that a state legal adviser, who told Bristol, Tennessee Director of Schools Gary Lilly that while school principals who paddled students were legally protected from allegations of assault, they were not immune from accusations of inappropriate or improper touching.

Ouch! For the second time in a month, a school district in Leflore County has been hit with a lawsuit from a student alleging injuries from a paddling.

An 11-year-old is seeking $500,000 from the Greenwood Public School District in a suit filed Monday in Leflore County Circuit Court.

Court documents state a coach caused “severe and painful injuries” to the student while paddling him in November 2008.

The child’s attorney, James Littleton, said photographs show deep bruising on the then-10-year- old’s buttocks and that he also suffered possible kidney damage.

“It was just unreal the abuse that this child took at the hands of a teacher,” Littleton said.

Paddling has been a hot-button issue of late in Leflore County. Just last month, the guardian of a 6-year-old kindergartner filed a $500,000 lawsuit against the Leflore County School District for alleged paddlings.

It is a mandate of the Surgeon General of the United States and of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations that patients be kept comfortable and free of pain. An institution’s license to provide medical care can be in jeopardy if these mandates are ignored.

The United States Department of Education, the United States Supreme Court and United States Congress must not continue to ignore research indicating that Physical/Corporal Punishment of Children in Schools is detrimental to the health and safety of our nation’s children and counterproductive to the learning environment, lowering children’s IQ’s. Corporal Punishment of Children in Schools is an outmoded, ineffective and dangerous practice that has been banned in more than l00 countries. It puts school districts at risk for lawsuits for paddling injuries, which is the main reason many districts already have abandoned it.
Research indicates that spanking lowers children’s IQ’s. Research on toddlers and other studies following children into adolescence found Physical Punishment was BAD FOR CHILDREN and made them more likely to show anti-social behavior. Children who were exposed to physical discipline most frequently were two to three times more likely to show anti-social behavior as an adolescent, including things like getting into fights, being disobedient at home or at school, general delinquency and being in trouble with teachers. Violence begets violence is a lesson from history not just child psychology."

Several national children’s health and education organizations have official positions statements OPPOSING School Corporal Punishment of Children including the American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Bar Association, the National PTA (Parent Teacher Association) and the National Education Association, among others

Educators powerfully model physical assault/violence as the acceptable way to solve problems to our children when they punish them by hitting them with wooden paddles. Paddling is a lawsuit waiting to happen. In a day when some schools limit kids from playing tag on the playground for fear of a lawsuit-inducing injury, school boards are asking for trouble to sanction a practice that is intended to inflict pain. How will schools in the 20 remaining states where the outmoded, ineffective, dangerous practice of Physical/Corporal punishment of children remains legal possibly maintain order without the paddle? For ideas, they could start by asking any of the 30 states that do it every day and that do not use Corporal Punishment on school children.

Teacher Education Colleges must teach that classroom management must NEVER involve school employees hitting children with wooden paddles to deliberately inflict physical pain and suffering as punishment and stress to children from fear, humiliation, and anxiety, which also adversely affects the learning/working environment of all witnessing classmates and staff.


Rights granted by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which stipulates that no state may deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person … the equal protection of the laws. Physical/Corporal Punishment of Children in Schools is already ILLEGAL in 30 states! For this reason, Physical/Corporal Punishment of Children in Schools is not equally applied in schools and any law allowing it is unconstitutional!

By: PDeverit on 11/11/09
Child buttock-battering vs. DISCIPLINE:

Child buttock-battering for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad habit.

Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit.

I think the reason why television shows like "Supernanny" and "Dr. Phil" are so popular is because that is precisely what many (not all) people are trying to do.

There are several reasons why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads recommended by professionals:

Plain Talk About Spanking
by Jordan Riak,

The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children
by Tom Johnson,

NO VITAL ORGANS THERE, So They Say
by Lesli Taylor M.D. and Adah Maurer Ph.D.

Most compelling of all reasons to abandon this worst of all bad habits is the fact that buttock-battering can be unintentional sexual abuse for some children. There is an abundance of educational resources, testimony, documentation, etc available on the subject that can easily be found by doing a little research with the recommended reads-visit www.nospank.net.

Just a handful of those helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea:

American Academy of Pediatrics,
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,
Center For Effective Discipline,
PsycHealth Ltd Behavioral Health Professionals,
Churches' Network For Non-Violence,
Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond Tutu,
Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps,
Global Initiative To End All Corporal Punishment of Children,
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

In 26 countries, child corporal punishment is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only UN member that did not ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

By: PDeverit on 11/11/09
Child buttock-battering vs. DISCIPLINE:

Child buttock-battering for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad habit.

Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit.

I think the reason why television shows like "Supernanny" and "Dr. Phil" are so popular is because that is precisely what many (not all) people are trying to do.

There are several reasons why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads recommended by professionals:

Plain Talk About Spanking
by Jordan Riak,

The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children
by Tom Johnson,

NO VITAL ORGANS THERE, So They Say
by Lesli Taylor M.D. and Adah Maurer Ph.D.

Most compelling of all reasons to abandon this worst of all bad habits is the fact that buttock-battering can be unintentional sexual abuse for some children. There is an abundance of educational resources, testimony, documentation, etc available on the subject that can easily be found by doing a little research with the recommended reads-visit www.nospank.net.

Just a handful of those helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea:

American Academy of Pediatrics,
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,
Center For Effective Discipline,
PsycHealth Ltd Behavioral Health Professionals,
Churches' Network For Non-Violence,
Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond Tutu,
Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps,
Global Initiative To End All Corporal Punishment of Children,
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

In 26 countries, child corporal punishment is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only UN member that did not ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.


Login and voice your opinion!
Powered by Bondware
Newspaper Software | Email Marketing Tools | E-Commerce Marketplace