Radioactive meeting tonight

Comment   Email   Print

ERROR: adman element function 'groupads' doesn't exist.

Related Articles
(Illustration courtesy of Google Maps)
Murfreesboro citizens finally get some answers and a chance to comment on the low-level radioactive waste dumped at Middle Point landfill in a Tuesday, July 17, public meeting.

Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation will attempt to assure the public to the safety of low-level radioactive waste and Middle Point landfill at this and several meetings held in Nashville.

The Murfreesboro meeting is scheduled for 5:30 p.m. at the Fleming Training Center located at 2022 Blanton Drive. A video presentation will be given at 5:30 and 6 o’clock, which will be followed by an open public comment period beginning at 6:30 p.m.

Oral comments will be recorded, written comments should be mailed to Joyce Dunlap at TN Department of Environment and Conservation 8th Floor, L&C Tower 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243 or e-mailed to

TDEC and the State Municipal Solid Waste Advisory Committee are charged with evaluating the Bulk Survey for Release program at Middle Point landfill by legislation passed last month that placed a moratorium on the program at Middle Point.

BSFR is a state-sanctioned program that allows dumping low-level radioactive waste in Class I commercial landfills.

After the revelation of the BSFR program, the General Assembly passed a 60-day moratorium.
The suspension allows for a study of the safety of the program and possible health and environmental impacts of low-level radioactive waste in Middle Point.

The July 5 meeting was held to introduce SWAC members to the program and effects of radiation on health and the environment.

At the committee meeting, TDEC officials told the audience the program is safe for the public and environment.

“It was an excellent presentation. A lot more information, detailed information, than I had gained through any other sources,” Tennessee State Representative Donna Rowland said.

Kathleen Ferris of Citizens to End Nuclear Dumping in Tennessee was not as convinced as Rowland.

“I think it’s a horse and pony show,” said Ferris, organizer of the grassroots group. “What they’re doing is simply giving the conclusion to these people who are going to make the decision. … They’re not giving objective, scientific expertise.”

TDEC representatives gave a far-reaching overview of the BSFR program, its history and the possible health and environmental effects of low-level radioactive waste.

Glen Pugh from Solid Waste Management described bulk survey waste as special waste and explained the special waste disposal process.

He also said special waste only constitutes 0.13 percent of the total waste in Middle Point, one of five landfills in the state authorized to accept such waste.

Eddie Nanney, director of the Division of Radiological Health (DRH), gave a brief history of the program, urged the public to use “common sense” when thinking of the BSFR and described the radiation level as “negligible.”

Roger Fenner then attempted to place radiation levels into perspective.

TDEC limits radiation exposure through this program to one millirem per year, as compared to 25 per year by the Nuclear Regulatory committee, Fenner explained.

One millirem is 10 times less radiation than a dental x-ray and has the cancer-causing effect equivalent to smoking 1.4 cigarettes, he explained.

He also said that an individual is exposed to one millirem of radiation in one year by watching television.

However, his efforts did not win over Pat Sanders of ENDIT.
Video of the July 5 meeting can be found at
Read more from:
ENDIT, Environment, General Assembly, Landfill, Middle Point Landfill, Radioactive Waste, Tennessee
Comment   Email   Print

ERROR: adman element function 'groupad' doesn't exist.

Members Opinions:
July 15, 2007 at 12:00am
if ok then place allin their yards
July 16, 2007 at 12:00am
Did you see last week's article regarding the 32 year old woman just diagnosed with breast cancer - she lives across the street from Middle Point.

This is serious business. Donna Rowland does NOT need to ignore ANY loopholes or sugar coat any findings.
July 16, 2007 at 12:00am
IF it is SO safe, why are they shipping it to us to bury?????
July 17, 2007 at 12:00am
If it were so safe why are we one of the few states and one of only 5 sites in the state allowing the dumping of this waste. Any radioactive waste should be an alarm for concern. Would one of the people trying to sell us the safety of the waste allow themselves to be put in a room with the so called "safe radioactive waste"?
Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: