MEDIA MATTERS: Do mosque opponents want other properties nixed too? on The Murfreesboro Post

Sidebar Ads

MEDIA MATTERS: Do mosque opponents want other properties nixed too?

Related Articles

Small-business center partners with bank to boost state exports

State sales tax on food set to drop July 1

TN Report.com: Lawmakers still discussing job-search incentives

Poll: Majority in Tenn. want immigration reform

United Way announces annual investment

PART II: Music triggers Rutherford County tourism

MRS. MURFREESBORO: Thoughts of dad flood Father's Day

VINSON: DOJ lights more fireworks in Coffee County

HUNTER: Celebrate Father's Day with variety of sports

Opportunities lay behind Doors of Hope

View All

By: LARRY BURRISS, Post Columnist

Posted: Thursday, June 7, 2012 12:00 am

It’s amazing sometimes how what we think of as obscure laws can have such unforeseen consequences.

For example, all of a sudden the Tennessee Open Meeting law is in the news, with some unexpected results.

The Tennessee Open Meeting Law specifies almost all government meetings have to have a public announcement.

More importantly, for our purposes, the law also specifies any actions taken at an unannounced meeting are invalid.

We usually think this applies to meetings involving things like tax increases and major construction proposals such as shopping malls.

But according to critics, the Rutherford County Regional Planning Commission violated the law when it approved construction of a mosque at the May 2010 meeting.

The question recently facing Chancellor Robert Corlew was whether announcements about the meeting were adequate notice for the public.

Last week, he ruled it did not.

So now mosque construction may or may not be on hold.

But at the same meeting the commission also approved construction of a storage unit, a fire hydrant waiver and proposed changes in sign regulations.

And now those actions are also called into question.

So here’s where the law of unintended consequences come into play.

The legality of the storage unit now comes into question, as do all of the other actions the commission took.

And since all of the actions involve property, the side-effects could rapidly escalate.

All of those people who said they were only concerned about the open meeting apparently didn’t seem to have any problem with the Planning Commission approving a storage unit at the supposedly unannounced meeting.

I wonder if they want the storage unit shut down?

You don’t think they really had something else in mind do you?

Like being single-mindedly opposed to the mosque?

What was your first clue?

Tagged under Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, Kevin Fisher, Larry Burriss, Planning Commission, Politics, Rutherford County, Tennessee, Voices

Member Opinions:

By: bota on 6/10/12
In my opinion, Judge Corlew came off as being in over his head and thus has created more problems than the one he was supposed to solve.

By: Venerable on 6/15/12
I agree--Judge Corlew has created a huge legal mess for the county. The ruling essentially negates not only the Planning Commission's actions from the one meeting, but ALL of their decisions since they started using the Post for notification. If they prevent the Mosque from opening, they also have to stop all other "under construction" structures (including St. Mark's) from opening as well. Anything less opens up the county to further lawsuits and continues the barrage of negative media for the county.