-
Sidebar Ads
-
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Email
Print
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Google
Yahoo!Member Opinions:
By: borowatcher on 10/30/10
So, was it a handgun as the title says or was it a rifle as the article says? Is it possible the writer doesn't know the difference?
So, was it a handgun as the title says or was it a rifle as the article says? Is it possible the writer doesn't know the difference?
By: MichelleWillard on 10/30/10
@borowatcher,
If you look at the first sentence of the article, "Aggravated assault and assault on officers’ charges were filed Thursday against a suspect accused of threatening a man with a handgun and fighting with two deputies, said Sheriff Robert F. Arnold," you'll find your answer.
@borowatcher,
If you look at the first sentence of the article, "Aggravated assault and assault on officers’ charges were filed Thursday against a suspect accused of threatening a man with a handgun and fighting with two deputies, said Sheriff Robert F. Arnold," you'll find your answer.
By: spook on 10/30/10
If you look further in the article, it says .22 cal. RIFLE so I guess we'd best ask the deputies involved.
If you look further in the article, it says .22 cal. RIFLE so I guess we'd best ask the deputies involved.
By: MichelleWillard on 10/30/10
Could it not be both?
Could it not be both?
By: acdsrool on 10/30/10
@MichelleWillard...seriously, both? So, are you saying he had two weapons? A handgun and a rifle? How does that work? I don't know about anyone else but any time I shoot a rifle or shotgun I always use both hands. How, then, does that leave a free hand for a handgun? Just thinking out loud here!
@MichelleWillard...seriously, both? So, are you saying he had two weapons? A handgun and a rifle? How does that work? I don't know about anyone else but any time I shoot a rifle or shotgun I always use both hands. How, then, does that leave a free hand for a handgun? Just thinking out loud here!
By: spook on 10/30/10
Perhaps the perp was chasing the victim with the rifle and then later tried to grab the deputy's handgun during the struggle?
Perhaps the perp was chasing the victim with the rifle and then later tried to grab the deputy's handgun during the struggle?
By: JoesMontana on 10/30/10
"man charged after THREATEN others..."
maybe.......threatenING ?
Did Robert Arnold write this article ?
"man charged after THREATEN others..."
maybe.......threatenING ?
Did Robert Arnold write this article ?
By: JoesMontana on 10/30/10
yes......very confusing. 2 rifle references and 2 handgun references.
yes......very confusing. 2 rifle references and 2 handgun references.
By: Tama73 on 10/30/10
Not confusing.. suspect(bupasiri) only had a rifle, then suspect(bupasiri) attempted to grab Deputy Young's weapon. now it doesnt mention handgun anywhere in here but the post may have fixed it.
Not confusing.. suspect(bupasiri) only had a rifle, then suspect(bupasiri) attempted to grab Deputy Young's weapon. now it doesnt mention handgun anywhere in here but the post may have fixed it.
By: acdsrool on 10/31/10
Oh, yeah, Tama, they fixed it but the aggravating thing is they (Post writers) never admit to a mistake or say thanks for pointing out the problem or anything. They fix it and go on and then others read the article/comments and it is even more confusing because now people are wondering what the earlier comments are about. Just once, Post, please acknowledge a mistake was made and then corrected.
Oh, yeah, Tama, they fixed it but the aggravating thing is they (Post writers) never admit to a mistake or say thanks for pointing out the problem or anything. They fix it and go on and then others read the article/comments and it is even more confusing because now people are wondering what the earlier comments are about. Just once, Post, please acknowledge a mistake was made and then corrected.
By: MichelleWillard on 10/31/10
It was corrected after the writer admitted her mistake. I find it funny that with the anonymity that comes with online comments, you find it acceptable to insult the intelligence of those by giving your real name and stop hiding behind a pseudonym. I use my name on here, why can't you. There is a big difference between real constructive criticism and these comments.
It was corrected after the writer admitted her mistake. I find it funny that with the anonymity that comes with online comments, you find it acceptable to insult the intelligence of those by giving your real name and stop hiding behind a pseudonym. I use my name on here, why can't you. There is a big difference between real constructive criticism and these comments.
By: acdsrool on 10/31/10
@MichelleWillard...don't you work for The Post? Also, please direct us to the admission of mistake. Additionally, maybe I'm not the brightest in the world but your second sentence doesn't make sense, even after reading it multiple times.
@MichelleWillard...don't you work for The Post? Also, please direct us to the admission of mistake. Additionally, maybe I'm not the brightest in the world but your second sentence doesn't make sense, even after reading it multiple times.
By: MichelleWillard on 10/31/10
I find it funny that with the anonymity that comes with online comments, you find it acceptable to insult the intelligence of those by NOT giving your real name and stop hiding behind a pseudonym.
There was an omitted "not."
I do work for the Post.
And you still hide behind your screen name.
I find it funny that with the anonymity that comes with online comments, you find it acceptable to insult the intelligence of those by NOT giving your real name and stop hiding behind a pseudonym.
There was an omitted "not."
I do work for the Post.
And you still hide behind your screen name.
By: spook on 10/31/10
Sounds like someone is a little touchy. Wonder how the POST feels about an employee taking issue with a reader? Not very professional, in my opinion. If the POST is against screen names, then why allow them?
Sounds like someone is a little touchy. Wonder how the POST feels about an employee taking issue with a reader? Not very professional, in my opinion. If the POST is against screen names, then why allow them?
By: acdsrool on 10/31/10
@MichelleWillard...and you still didn't provide us with the admission of mistake.
@spook...yep, a little touchy. When ballplayers react to comments from the crowd they are referred to as having 'rabbit ears'.
@MichelleWillard...and you still didn't provide us with the admission of mistake.
@spook...yep, a little touchy. When ballplayers react to comments from the crowd they are referred to as having 'rabbit ears'.
By: JoesMontana on 10/31/10
Michelle, don't be so touchy when readers point out mistakes. Words are your business....your chosen profession.
Take the time to get them right. Otherwise, go work for the DNJ.
and the headline is STILL grammatically wrong
Michelle, don't be so touchy when readers point out mistakes. Words are your business....your chosen profession.
Take the time to get them right. Otherwise, go work for the DNJ.
and the headline is STILL grammatically wrong
By: rickfromtheboro on 11/4/10
Two words come to mind. Spell Check.
Two words come to mind. Spell Check.