• Sidebar Ads




Man arrested for posting nude photos of minor on web


 Related Articles
Email Print
A 19-year-old man was charged this week with the sexual exploitation of a minor in a sealed indictment.

David Michael Buttermore, of Shoreham Street, was arrested Tuesday by the Murfreesboro police and taken to the police department for questioning.

Buttermore was accused of taking pictures of his 16-year-old girlfriend and posting them on the internet.

The victim alleged Buttermore had taken sexually explicit photos of her for prurient purposes and sent her explicit photos of other unidentified women.

He admitted to posting the photo as a way “to get back at” the victim, MPD Det. Wayne Lawson reported.

Buttermore’s bond was set at $20,000. He is scheduled to appear in court Monday, April 18.

For further information was available.

•••

In a separate incident, a registered sex offender was arrested Friday, April 1 for unlawful photography.

Wendell D. Barnett, 25, of Factory Road, was arrested after he photographed a minor child at a retail store.

When questioned about the incident, Barnett allegedly lied to the police, garnering him and his girlfriend, Chantel Hogan, 20, also of Factory Road, additional charges of filing a false report.

•••

A woman found ingredients to manufacture meth in her ex-boyfriend’s apartment when she stopped in to pick up some of her belongings.

Christine Lutz, 30, of Nolensville, Tenn., reported her ex-boyfriend, Kenny Short to MPD after she allegedly found “chemicals and other materials possibly used in the manufacture of meth” in his apartment, MPD Officer Mick Rea reported.

Rea searched the apartment and allegedly discovered some of the items had been combined in an apparent attempt to make the drug.

The offending items were confiscated and the apartment was quarantined.

 
 
 
Tagged under  Crime, MPD


Member Opinions:
By: jimmychurch on 4/7/11
It would appear from the pictures on the internet, facebook, cell phones and other electronic media, that teenagers allowing themselves to be photographed naked, seems to be the norm. Once a picture hits the Internet, it is out there forever. It is not about the age of consent that I question... it is about my wonder in a 16 year old not seeing the stories of others that were exploited and still they do it.

By: bst2i_mtsu_s11 on 4/8/11
This incident would be sick if a 60-year-old man took a naked picture of an underage girl while he was creeping around the house in which she lived. Or just a peeping tom exposing pictures of underage children or adults in general. However, the first incident was of a boyfriend exposing pictures of his, then, girlfriend. Now, the only crime I see is that he is 19 years-old, and she is 16-years old. By law that is statutory rape, even if she does allow him to be with her. The fact that she allowed him to take a picture of her while naked, I see no harm. The fact that he exposed the pictures on the internet, I see no harm. Is it wrong? Yes. But she allowed him to do it. If in those pictures she was posing, smiling, laughing, etc., she wanted her picture taken. And after the pictures were taken, she risked them being exposed. You can’t trust people. The phone or camera could have gotten in the wrong hands and from there the pictures could have been exposed. I feel sorry for the girl that this has happened to her. But if you don’t want to be seen, don’t give people something to look at.


Login and voice your opinion!
Making Websites Easy Since 2001
Newspaper Software | Connect Email Marketing | Express Website Builder | WordPress Hosting