• Sidebar Ads




Judge asked to dismiss Killings' reckless homicide charge


 Related Articles
Email Print
Attorneys for a sheriff’s detective facing trial for reckless homicide of an 11-year-old girl filed motions stating his rights are being violated based on a review of 58 other fatalities.

Former sheriff’s Sgt. Ron Killings faces trial Feb. 8 for killing pedestrian Lakeisha White in a crash July 11, 2008 on Bradyville Pike. Prosecutor Joe Baugh said information from the vehicle showed Killings was driving 62 mph when the vehicle struck the girl.

In a pretrial motion, attorneys Terry Fann and Ben Parsley examined 58 fatal traffic crashes with no alcohol present during the past five years investigated by Murfreesboro Police and the Tennessee Highway Patrol in Rutherford County. Only one person, a woman, was prosecuted for reckless homicide in those crashes.

Fann and Parsley contend the prosecution of Killings, who is black, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. and Tennessee Constitutions. Lakeisha was black.

Killings’ attorneys are expected to ask Circuit Court Judge David Bragg to dismiss the indictment against him during a motions hearing at 1 p.m. Monday. The motion was supposed to be heard Friday but dismissed because county offices closed at noon.

Also, Killings’ attorneys filed motions to exclude the testimony of THP Trooper Allen Brenneis’ who is a member of the Critical Incident Response Team, who investigated the crash months later and to exclude photographs of Bradyville Pike taken at the crash site since the street was improved.

Because of pretrial publicity, jurors will be chosen from Hamilton County Feb. 8 and transported to Rutherford County to hear the case.

 
 
 
Tagged under  Lakeisha White, Sgt. Ron Killings


Member Opinions:
By: Macgyver on 1/29/10
"In a pretrial motion, attorneys Terry Fann and Ben Parsley examined 58 fatal traffic crashes with no alcohol present during the past five years investigated by Murfreesboro Police and the Tennessee Highway Patrol in Rutherford County. Only one person, a woman, was prosecuted for reckless homicide in those crashes."
I'm sorry, did any of these cases involve a person traveling 72 mph in a 35, 2 seconds before they hit them? This was an accident that could have been prevented if he was traveling the speed limit.

By: devolver on 1/30/10
@Macgyver: I think, perhaps, a little more transparency might ease the minds of concerned citizens...

@MikePirtle: any chance you can publish information on the 58 cases they "reviewed"?

By: RonB on 1/30/10
I see the "race card" has been played.

By: truthandjustice1 on 1/30/10
I dare say many of those cases have the same details except they were not in law enforcement and backing up another officer in need, does this make it right by no means no, but, these guys and girls have make this same choice almost everyday, they call it 10-18 traffic. Check it out, every department does it, I dare say in the future most department will no longer allow this and we the citizen will be waiting much longer for help. It is a catch 22. I will say if this had have happen in any other neighborhood this would not be in court. The bottles and not giving a proper statement and the paper putting him on trial is what has made a joke out of this. He will never be convicted of the reckless homicide, the false statement and improper disposal of evidence....yep.

By: josef on 1/31/10
Shame, shame shame...

We all know that is happening here...

By: Farmall on 2/1/10
"Fann and Parsley contend the prosecution of Killings, who is black, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. and Tennessee Constitutions. Lakeisha was black."

Good thing the car wasn't balck, worse yet it was probably white. So if the policeman had been white, then equal protection clause wouldn't apply? So how does skin color even aply? I bet the jury sees right through all this crap.


Login and voice your opinion!
Powered by Bondware
Newspaper Software | Email Marketing Tools | E-Commerce Marketplace