Join Us Box / Rack Advertise Service Contact Us
 
 
 
 
  Welcome Visitor, 570 members online. Date: Fri, Mar 19, 2010 My Account Login/Register  Search:   advanced  
How to tell if you have become radioactive



 Related Articles
Email Print
I have to admit that I have now added a new item to my list of things to stay awake worrying about: a radioactive landfill a few miles from my house. I watched Demetria on Channel Four when she broke the news that you and I are living near a deposition of "low level" radioactive waste. I was startled to hear that the state environmental authorities decided it was OK to allow dumping of other states' nuclear waste into our backyard without bothering to inform local officials. Actually, I can't recall whether any local folks were told or not… at any rate, no one told me or the people that live within breathing distance of BFI landfill.


First residents living near the landfill had to put up with smelling Nashville's sewage sludge being trucked in for nearly two decades. Now they discover that they are being subjected to disposal of radioactive waste from other states.


We have been assured that there's no harm, but as one opinion poster noted earlier this week, if it is so safe, why do they have to transport it all the way from California and other states to dispose of it?


This topic caused me to do some wondering; what other sources of radioactivity am I routinely exposed to? The obvious sources come to mind; medical x-rays, CT scans and airport x-ray machines. But, did you realize that the smoke detectors and other objects in your home have tiny amounts of radioactive material?


Last year I read the fascinating true story of an overly bright but poorly supervised Boy Scout that nearly succeeded in constructing his own nuclear reactor. Among other sources, he collected hundreds of discarded smoke detectors and carefully scraped off the miniscule amounts of emitting material. As a result of his singular focus on accomplishing his objective, the tool shed in his back yard that had served as his workshop had to be dismantled by federally licensed nuclear material-handling specialists. Thankfully for all of us, he was discovered before he was able to actually start a nuclear reaction. I still think he should be eligible for a badge; I'm just not sure what the category would be.


You and I are exposed to a regular dose of radiation from decaying isotopes occurring in our natural environment. I'm told that flying across the country at 30,000 feet exposes us to naturally occurring cosmic radiation that is significant. We are also exposed to radiation from sources such as televisions, some computer monitors, ground source radon and other materials. Of course, it is one thing to realize that we have some exposure from our natural environment, and it is something quite different to learn that our local soil and water are being contaminated by the intentional transfer of radioactive material from other states that prefer to maintain their own safety.


I have been unable to find any specific measurement tools available to the general public to determine whether you are radioactive or not, but I have come across some possible indicators:


If your toast is done to a perfect golden brown, without the toaster being plugged in…


If you strip naked at the airport and the detector still goes off…


If you don't need a nightlight when you get out of bed in the middle of the night…


If you are being followed by men in black SUVs' wearing plastic suits…


And finally,


If your child invites to "show and tell" to demonstrate a Geiger counter…


… you might be radioactive.


All kidding aside, I love Middle Tennessee. I love the people, the cultural traditions, the beautiful landscapes, and the pleasant way of life that prevails. Other communities in our country have learned hard lessons after being duped into naively accepting someone else's word about the "safety" of nuclear material being dumped in their midst. It is my opinion that our community is too special to allow even a shovelful of radioactive waste potentially risk the health of our future generations.


Next week, I'll have some news about new medical tests that will be of interest to you. In the meantime, let's all work to keep our community healthy for our children and grandchildren.


Dr. Mark Kestner
mkestner@drkestner.com

Share: 
Tags: None

Member Opinions:
By: RadConTech on 1/12/10
Dear Dr. Kestner,

I read your post and have to say that I understand your concern and surprise to learn that a landfill near your home will begin accepting low level radioactive waste.

If I may, I'd like to respond to some of the points you make in your post. Before I do that however I'd like to provide some background about myself. I have worked in the nuclear industry for many years and have specialized in the area of radiological controls. More specifically, I have specialized in the supervision of radiological work to ensure the safety of the public as well as the individuals actually working with radioactive material.

I'll start by agreeing with the assurance that you were given, namely that "there is no harm" with one caveat... That being this - there is no harm as long as the rules (state and federal regulations) are followed. The regulatory bodies that oversee these matters are very strict and have specific guidelines written with the public in mind... If you are concerned with the landfill accepting radioactive material I would encourage you to see what part in the regulatory process you can become a part in. As for the remark about shipping it all the way from California defending the viewpoint that there is danger lurking - I would disagree. Locations for storage of radioactive waste are selected based on many factors. Some of them logistic, others being economic and still others being political. Look into the Yucca Mountain project... That facility was planned, agreed upon, most of the way built and now disputed as to whether or not it can be used... States agree to take on the waste based on the economical advantages having such an operation would bring, weighed heavily on the reaction of the folks living in the state and the benefit in the way of jobs, federal money etc that will come to the state. Location selection for sites like these is a very in depth topic and not in my specific area of expertise so I'll leave that with you as food for thought regarding location selection and sending things all the way from California.

You can read a very good description of what "Low Level Radioactive Waste" is at this link:
http://ohioline.osu.edu/rer-fact/rer_10.html

To touch breifly on the topic of radioactive material in the home - you mentioned smoke detectors... Smoke detectors have a small amount of Americium-241 in them. I just looked at mine and it is labeled as having 0.9 MicrCuries - most likely < 1/2000th of a gram of material. This is a miniscule amount and it is housed in a chamber that protects it from being released. Am-241 emits Alpha radiation... When smoke is present the smoke literally SHIELDS the alpha radiation. The smoke detector alarms when the alpha radiation sensor STOPS detecting the alpha radiation from the Am-241 source due to being shielded from the smoke. In essence your smoke detector is a "loss of radiation alarm". The fact is that alpha radiation is very easily shielded. The layer of dead skin cells of your body are enough to shield you from its radiation. Alpha radiation becomes a danger to you only if ingested by eating / drinking / inhaling it. Having a smoke detector in your home poses absolutely no harm from radioactivity whatsoever. The safety factor of having a smoke detector is infinitely more valuable to you and your family.

The name of the "overly bright but poorly supervised boy scout" as you describe him is David Hahn. David received the Atomic Energy merrit badge and thirsted to learn more and experiment with nuclear power. He did in fact produce many nuclear reactions... He used Am-241 from smoke detectors to create an alpha radiation stream which he then using other materials converted that alpha stream into a neutron stream which he was able to then "irradiate" other materials eventually creating "fuel" for his reactor which he then successfully operated. It was at this point when he began to understand he was over his head. At about that point he was discovered and the federal government stepped in and cleaned up the areas that he had contaminated.

Flying across country in an airplane at high altitude does increase one's exposure to cosmic radiation however we are all exposed to cosmic radiation. Those who reside at lower altitudes recieve lower amounts that those who live at higher altitudes. Driving long distances on our highways also provides a source of exposure depending on the materials that the road is constructed from. Do you have granite countertops in your home? You may be reciving a dose from that depending on where the granite came from and what concentrations of Uranium are present.

In terms of a device to measure radiation there are a few out on the market. The one that I would recommend can be found at:
http://www.gammascout.com/

Dr. Kestner, with all due respect, it is my opinion that your fear and concern on this matter stem from two apects. The first is fear of the unknown and the second is distrust of the nuclear industry / government. The first is easily overcome with some research. As for the latter... unfortunately, a small percentage in the nuclear industry have given reason for people to distrust the entire lot and the government has had its issues as well.

I will email you privately with a copy of this post and my contact information.

Regards,
RadConTech


Login and voice your opinion!