• Sidebar Ads




County has two needs: Middle Schools & money


 Related Articles
Email Print
Rutherford County needs a couple of new schools.

Rutherford County also needs some money to run those schools once they are completed.

Two new middle schools – one near Buchanan Elementary on Manchester Highway and another across from Oakland High School on Dejarnette Lane – are on the horizon and are slated to open in 2010.

But Rutherford County Mayor Ernest Burgess warned against the on-going cost of operating two more schools in the county system.

“We need to look at the long-term picture and reoccurring costs,” Burgess said this week.

Burgess then said it isn’t certain when the economy will recover from the current recession. If things are similar in 2010, a property tax increase will be needed to fund running the schools.

The Rutherford County Board of Education has approved the schools, as has the county commission. The county has even approved taking out a loan to pay for them.

The school board expects construction to begin in April with a price tag of $24 million each, not including the cost of land.

Good news is, with the depressed economy, the rate of population growth in the county has fallen off and the building cost should be between 10-20 percent less than budgeted, Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum Don Odom said.

“There are three times the normal amount of bidders,” Odom said, and the bidding hasn’t even closed yet.

The bad news is it cost the school system almost $1 million to staff – not counting the cost of hiring new teachers – Rockvale Middle School this year.

Burgess estimated it could cost an additional $12 million in new money to operate the new middle schools, as well as Brown’s Chapel Elementary, over the first two years they are open and pay for the debt.

RCS Community Relations Coordinator James Evans said costs include an increase in utilities, administration, librarians and so on, but that the schools are needed.

“These schools are definitely needed as soon as possible because we have approximately 3,000 students who have to attend classroom everyday in a what amounts to a trailer,” Evans said.

Evans said the schools would relieve overcrowding at Lascassas and Buchanan by moving sixth through eighth-grade students and opening up seats for younger students at the older schools.

School Board Chairman Mark Byrnes told the Budget and Finance Committee the middle school plan is part of a larger plan that has many benefits, not limited to converting Central Middle School into a magnet school.

“Once the new middle schools are open, we’ll also be able to convert Central into a magnet school for grades 7-12 and McFadden will have additional k-5 magnet seats because it will no longer offer grades 6-8,” Evans said.

Michelle Willard can be contacted at 615-869-0816 or mwillard@murfreesboropost.com.
 
 
 
Tagged under  RCS, RuCo


Member Opinions:
By: Curious on 3/1/09
This is a real dilemma.
The schools are needed, building them now would put some people to work (do we have a clause in our contracts banning illegal workers?), cost of materials are down, yet the cost of opening and running the new schools is huge and ongoing.

On the other hand, the economic downturn has left many, many property tax payers, both residential and business, in a precarious financial position where a tax increase would create very real hardships.

The state, county and cities are still "between a rock and a hard place" because of our tax structure being based on sales tax and property tax rather than income.

By: Macgyver on 3/1/09
I'm all for the "impact tax" on new homes. Make these new homes pay for the services they will require. With the powers that be, being builders and bankers thats a tough sell.

By: barrettbear on 3/2/09
Our current workforce(people) has two needs: keep their jobs and pay their bills, and slated to have their debts paid by 2010. Will this happen seeing how the economy is in disarray?

By: TimPowers on 3/2/09
The "impact tax" discussion is long gone. Our county/city leaders and the builders/developers/bankers put it off long enough that it isn't viable. Taxes on new homes would have helped starting in the late 80's and early 90's when growth outpaced property tax revenue. Boy, are we going to pay for not implementing the growth taxes now through high unfair property taxes.

By: TimPowers on 3/2/09
And the development fee of $750 (now $1500) was a bone thrown to pacify, not to curtail over building and the need for new schools.

By: Gwendolyn on 3/2/09
All the county every needs is MONEY! It's always for the children. Let the growth and parents pay for all this or get by without it. Someone should have stopped all the "growth" years ago.

By: TimeforJustice on 3/2/09
Gwendoly, everyone benefits when children get an education not just the parents. Who do you think the taxpayers of tomorrow might be? If they are uneducated, they will not be able to support you and your elderly friends when the time comes. :)

By: goodmom on 3/3/09
Here we go again with Mayor Burgess wanting to put a hold on things........He needs to put his office in a portable.
But Rutherford County Mayor Ernest Burgess warned against the on-going cost of operating two more schools in the county system.
“We need to look at the long-term picture and reoccurring costs,” Burgess said this week

By: TimPowers on 3/3/09
"they will not be able to support you and your elderly friends when the time comes."

Nobody should depend on other taxpayers to support them. Depend on: 1st yourself, 2nd your own family.

As far as building the new schools now, I'm not sure that the argument of lower construction costs is true - Lowe's and Home Depot prices are about the same as always.

By: vdanr on 3/4/09
This is my opinion... many of these things should have been addressed when the growth in Rutherford County first started. That was before the country/state was in a recession. That's why it's important to have short and long term goals and directives. Gwendolyn, I don't think anyone could have stopped the growth that we experienced. Is growth really such a bad thing?? I don't think so.

By: TimPowers on 3/5/09
Growth isn't bad. Uncontrolled, unmanaged growth with little restraint is bad. Greed drove Rutherford County growth since the 1980's just like driving the stock market to 14,000. Just like greed is driving people to elect the local, state and federal officials we have today - "what can government do for me" is the question voters ask now (not "what can I do for the nation).

By: Farmall on 3/6/09
The ancient old Buchanan school holds about 4 times as many students as it was designed for. Of the entire 4th grade class only one classroom is in the building the rest are in the portables. (along with many other classes) Yet with its age and huge overcrowding it still ranks as one of the best in the county. I believe that we would better be served by a high school built in this area, instead of the dual bussing systems to get all the high school children first to Buchanan then transfered to Riverdale. We have more than enough need to support a high school in this area. A middle school would be nice, but I see a greater need for a high school on this side of the county.


Login and voice your opinion!
Powered by Bondware
Newspaper Software | Email Marketing Tools | E-Commerce Marketplace