• Sidebar Ads




Commission debates Bush-era road sign rules


 Related Articles
Email Print
A request for additional funding for county street signs was questioned Thursday by some commissioners.

County Highway Superintendent Mike Williams requested moving $50,000 to the county's highway fund for maintenance of existing signs, but some commissioners viewed this as wasteful spending on an unfunded government mandate.

"I don't think we ought to agree to this when we don't know what the federal government is going to do with this," Commissioner Robert Stevens told the commission.

The new federal road sign rules Stevens and some commissioners question were implemented by the Bush Administration and require local cities and municipalities to foot the bill for safety enhancements to street signs. The Bush Administration changed the font of street signs in 2007 arguing it will help people get their eyes back on the road.

Stevens questioned the federal government's road sign rule changes and wondered why local governments have to maintain national standards for street signs. Stevens also argued the county should not waste money while Congress reviews the mandated street sign enhancements.

"I think we're in day 15 of a 60 day review," Stevens added. "I don't see why we can't wait and see what they decide."

Stevens points to a move earlier this month by the Obama Administration to request additional public comment on the new rules.

"Given the difficult economic conditions states currently face, asking for additional input on compliance dates is the right thing to do," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a TDOT release November 29. "We want to be sure these safety requirements are reasonable, fair and cost-effective."

The review process will allow local governments to register their complaints on the Bush-era requirements now trickling down to Rutherford County.

"The regulations call for the replacement of some street signs," LaHood added. "While in better times this may have been appropriate, it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense given the difficult economic conditions facing many cities and states across the country."

Several commissioners came to Williams defense arguing the additional request was necessary for replacing signs that are stolen or damaged daily. At least one commissioner challenged the assertion the county would waste the money.

"I don't think he wants to spend anymore money out of his budget than he has to," Commissioner Joe Frank Jernigan said. "I don't think he's going to waste no money."

Only eight of the 21 commissioners voted against the additional funding.
 
 
 
Tagged under  RuCo


Member Opinions:
By: borowatcher on 12/18/10
Of course Joe Frank Jernigan is going to defend the Highway Department. If I'm not mistaken, he works there. However, I agree with him. I don't think they will waste the money (no money).

By: cmac on 12/18/10
It is amusing that the left-wing press continues to use the expression "Bush-era".

One wonders if, when Obama is at last put out to pasture, the press will continuously harp about the "Obama-nation"?

By: jimmychurch on 12/20/10
Actually, I am not sure what the money will be spent to do as far as improving signs. I can only comment on the current Murfreesboro street signs. I was looking for a street Saturday night that is off of Bradyville Pike. While the signs may be visible in the day-time, I found I had to be almost beside the street sign to read it. At night, the street signs are almost useless. As a suggestion, why doesn't the city put street signs next to traffic signals with the names of the cross street? It is very dangerous to have to try to see either the left or right side of the road looking for the street name. Just a suggestion.

By: SocEtTuem on 12/20/10
cmac writes: "It is amusing that the left-wing press continues to use the expression 'Bush-era'.
One wonders if, when Obama is at last put out to pasture, the press will continuously harp about the 'Obama-nation'?"

I would not count on it. The press clearly has a political agenda and that agenda is clearly left of center. It was the reason I dumped the DNJ and now it rears its head here. It's all GWB's fault.

By: coastie on 1/4/11
A study was done to determine whether changing the lettering and reflective taping would be beneficial to drivers, especially at night time. I agree with "jimmychurch" in that sometimes you have to be right next to the street in order to see it. With this new regulation, it would give drivers a bit more time to read the sign.

It should be noted that the government is providing some funding. According to the American Traffic Safety Services Association website (http://www.atssa.com/cs/root/news_pr/retroreflectivity_media), the funding comes in the from of:

Funding
Surface Transportation Program (STP)
o Used for a variety of transportation purposes, including:
 Improvement of signing and pavement markings
These funds can be used on all public roads except those
functionally classified as local or rural minor collectors.

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
o $1.25 billion annually goes to states
o Twenty-one (21) states transferred money from HSIP to other programs when it could have been used for these vital safety improvements. Eight states have used only 50 percent of their funding to date.

There are specific requirements to be able to use Highway Safety Improvement Program
Funds for sign upgrades. To be eligible for HSIP funds, the improvement of highway signage must be:
o Identified as a priority in the State’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan, AND
o Correct or improve a hazardous road location or feature or address a highway safety problem, AND
o Locations for potential safety improvement must be identified through a datadriven process

I thin it's a good idea if it means the roads will be safer and give drivers more time to respond than they previously have.


Login and voice your opinion!
Powered by Bondware
Newspaper Software | Email Marketing Tools | E-Commerce Marketplace